image-for-printing

Sweating your assets

There’s no getting away from it – gilts ain’t what they used to be and investors are looking for alternatives for their fixed income portfolios, writes Lynn Strongin-Dodds.

Miscellaneous

Web Share

There’s no getting away from it – gilts ain’t what they used to be and investors are looking for alternatives for their fixed income portfolios, writes Lynn Strongin-Dodds.

DEUTSCH THE WAY TO DO IT

One of his preferred trades is to sell 30-year German bunds in favour of buying its similarly long dated US government counterparts.

“If you look at the relationship over the past 20 years, it never exceeded 100 basis points (bps), but now with the European Central Bank’s latest quantitative easing programme, the spread has blown out by 200bps,” he says. “This dislocation is attractive because we believe the growth differential between Germany and the US implied by this spread is not sustainable over a long period of time.”

High yield and investment grade bonds as well as leveraged loans also garner a strong recommendation although selectivity is key given the stage
of the credit cycle.

“We are late in the cycle and corporates are more levered and spreads have come in,” says Adam Smears, head of fixed income research at Russell Investments. “There is a potential that there could be a sell-off as we run into summer, but there are opportunities. We believe a good starting point is to buy shorter duration, high quality high yield or low quality investment grade bonds. I view this as the yield engine, but I would add alpha diversifying strategies such as trading currencies and rates to smooth the pathway.”

In general though, European corporates, particularly in the high yield arena where returns are roughly 5.2% versus the roughly 1.1% in investment grade, are the favourites. Investors are more wary of the US, because although performance is slightly better at about 6%, the beleaguered energy and mining sectors are casting a pall. Analysts predict they could push the total percentage of defaults to a lofty 5-6%, up from roughly 2% last year and the long term average of 4.4%.

“High yield has seen a lot of stress but if you strip out energy, then there are companies that have strong fundamentals and balance sheets,” says Sorca Kelly Scholte, head of EMEA pensions solutions at JP Morgan Asset Management. “There are also opportunities in Europe, but the yields are lower because of the higher quality of the corporates and less exposure to the energy industry.”

TRADING UP

The US-based fund manager has shifted its portfolio towards those sectors, however, sitting at the higher quality and more defensive end in both the US and European high yield markets. Andreas Michalitsianos, executive director and portfolio manager in European investment grade corporate credit, says: “In both regions we have an up in quality bias within high yield. Sectors where we see value are autos along with cable, healthcare and utility companies because they tend to have a more transparent and stable cash flow profile. We are also allocatingto European investment grade because although the yields are lower the technicals are strong primarily due to the stimulus from the ECB and Bank of Japan.”

US investment grade credit has also taken a hit. Moody’s downgraded more companies in the first three months of the year than in the whole of 2015. Overall, 51 corporates slipped into junk territory, up from eight in the fourth quarter and 45 in 2015. Almost half emanated from the oil and mining industries. However, Pimco managing director and portfolio manager Mike Amey believes investors could still reap returns of 1% to 1.5% by focusing on strong credits that are more than capable of performing in a challenging or moderate growth environment. Illiquid credit strategies are also high on the list and over the past year institutions
have been busy filling the gap left by cash strapped and regulatory laden banks.

Recent figures from Willis Towers Watson show that typically pension funds have globally allocated more than $7bn to these investments, which range from direct lending to real estate and infrastructure debt, over the past five years.

“These are opportunities for investors who have the capacity to lock up liquidity,” says Riley. “It makes particular sense for pension funds and sovereign wealth funds that have long-term liabilities and limited near-term cash outflows. However, they also have to understand that in order to extract the illiquidity premium, there is an opportunity cost that rises during periods of market stress.”

More Articles

Subscribe

Subscribe to Our Newsletter and Magazine

Sign up to the portfolio institutional newsletter to receive a weekly update with our latest features, interviews, ESG content, opinion, roundtables and event invites. Institutional investors also qualify for a free-of-charge magazine subscription.

×