Safe as houses? The return of real estate

If you were to summarise what was going on  in the commercial property market in one  word, you could do worse than to alight on  ‘renaissance’. At least as far as the pensions  industry is concerned.

Features

Web Share

If you were to summarise what was going on  in the commercial property market in one  word, you could do worse than to alight on  ‘renaissance’. At least as far as the pensions  industry is concerned.

By Padraig Floyd

If you were to summarise what was going on  in the commercial property market in one  word, you could do worse than to alight on  ‘renaissance’. At least as far as the pensions  industry is concerned.

Since 2008, all the comforting investment  market landmarks have shifted. Volatility  isn’t something to avoid, but limit; you can’t  necessarily bank on the equity risk premium;  and there is no such thing as a safe  haven.  Pension funds are not speculative beasts;  their raison d’etre is income to meet the  liabilities  their members’ benefits represent.  And so, as gilts became expensive and other  sovereign debt got a bit too hot, they were  forced to look elsewhere for solid indexlinked  returns.

Love/hate relationship

That led them back to real estate, an asset  class UK pension funds have always had a  love/hate relationship with.  Commercial real estate saw something of a  recovery in 2013 in global terms. The market  grew by about £330bn (US$549bn), an  increase  of 18% on 2012, according to Jones  Lang LaSalle.

The biggest single winner was the UK,  largely  London, mostly the City with prime  commercial taking twice the considerable  amount allocated to the west end.  The UK saw almost £50bn (€58bn) invested  in the last year, mostly by sovereign wealth  funds and very large pension funds, says  Ben Sanderson, director of fund  management,  Hermes Real Estate.

“The globalisation of real estate is accelerating.  It’s not just people placing cash to avoid  the troubles of the world, but significant  allocations  from pension funds from Asia,  Canada and Australia, among others,”  Sanderson says.  “For pension funds, real estate is classic  portfolio diversification. These funds are  strategically diversifying into real estate  across the major markets of the world.”

Thinking outside the box, or square  mile  

Conventional wisdom says if you’re not buying  prime real estate in central London at  3.5%, you’re out of the market, adds  Sanderson.  With London prices so high and  demand so strong, investors are looking further  afield – to London Bridge Quarter or  Aldgate rather than the traditional square  mile of the City.  The regions are also being considered –  Birmingham,  Manchester and Leeds are in  the premier league with strong regional markets  and good transport networks, while  Bristol, Glasgow and Edinburgh are all competing  for promotion.

Despite government programmes designed  to stimulate the residential property market  with the £130bn Funding for Lending package  for business, two Help to Buy campaigns  for consumers and easement of the permitted  development rights for developers looking  to convert commercial properties into  residential, residential simply is not high on  the agenda for the commercial property  managers.  Though many like it in overseas jurisdictions,  they avoid it here and with good  reason,  says, Kiran Patel, property fund  manager  at Cordea Savills.

Residential property faces two major  problems  before it can become a mainstream  asset class. The first is about achieving scale,  says Patel. A pension fund investing £100m  into commercial property may access a few  properties and a small number of institutional  tenants with relatively long leases.  The same investment in residential will  produce  a fragmented portfolio and having  multiple units is not the same as having 200  units in a shopping centre.

“This makes it difficult to get scale and  tenants  will be on short two or three year  contracts,” says Patel. “There could be a lot  of reversing and leakage in income and pension  funds need income.”

He accepts residential is attractive due to a  structural undersupply, but while “the DNA  of the residential sector is about getting on  the property ladder”, the dynamics of the  private  rented sector (PRS) are not solely  reliant  on every Englishman wanting his  own castle.

Comments

More Articles

Subscribe

Subscribe to Our Newsletter and Magazine

Sign up to the portfolio institutional newsletter to receive a weekly update with our latest features, interviews, ESG content, opinion, roundtables and event invites. Institutional investors also qualify for a free-of-charge magazine subscription.

×